Amotivation
Low intention because the athlete sees little value, control or expectation of success.
VALUES, DIRECTION & ACTION
Motivation is not a fixed amount that an athlete either possesses or lacks. Its quality, direction and persistence are shaped by meaning, needs, context and the goals that organise action.
LEARNING OUTCOMES
By the end of this module, you should be able to:
START WITH THE RIGHT QUESTION
Two athletes may train equally hard while acting for very different reasons.
One may participate because the sport is valued and personally meaningful; another may act mainly through pressure, fear or contingent approval. Both can produce effort in the short term, but the quality and sustainability of motivation may differ.
SELF-DETERMINATION CONTINUUM
External motivation is not a single category. Regulation can become more internalised as the athlete understands, accepts and integrates the value of an activity.
Low intention because the athlete sees little value, control or expectation of success.
Participation mainly to obtain rewards, avoid punishment or meet external demands.
Action driven by internal pressure such as guilt, shame, ego protection or contingent worth.
The athlete recognises the personal importance and value of the behaviour.
The behaviour fits coherently with the athlete’s values, identity and broader life.
Participation because the activity itself is interesting, enjoyable or satisfying.
BASIC PSYCHOLOGICAL NEEDS
Self-determination theory proposes that autonomy, competence and relatedness are fundamental psychological needs. Coaches do not “give” motivation, but their behaviour can shape the conditions in which motivation develops.
Do I experience meaningful choice and ownership?
Offer bounded choices, explain rationales and invite the athlete’s perspective.
Do I feel capable of learning and improving?
Set optimally challenging tasks, provide informational feedback and make progress visible.
Do I feel respected, connected and significant?
Build trustworthy relationships, inclusive team norms and genuine interpersonal support.
THREE TYPES OF GOAL
A strong system can include all three, but immediate execution should normally be anchored in controllable process actions.
Winning, ranking, selection or finishing ahead of others.
Meaningful, but partly dependent on opponents, selection and conditions.A measurable level of performance compared with a defined standard.
More personally referenced, but still influenced by weather, health and competition conditions.A behaviour, strategy or technical cue required to perform effectively.
Most directly controllable and immediately actionable.WHAT THE EVIDENCE SAYS
An early meta-analysis reported a small positive effect of goal setting across sport, exercise and motor-performance studies.
Kyllo & Landers (1995) ↗A later sport-specific synthesis reported larger pooled effects for process goals than for performance or outcome goals, while noting limitations in the evidence base.
Williamson et al. (2022) ↗Goal effects depend on factors such as ability, task complexity, commitment, feedback and whether the athlete has strategies to pursue the target.
Locke & Latham (2002) ↗BUILD A GOAL HIERARCHY
What meaningful sporting direction is the athlete pursuing?
What results and standards indicate progress?
Which physical, technical, tactical or psychological capability must improve?
Which repeatable behaviours create the required adaptation?
What is the next controllable action?
SMART IS A CHECKLIST—NOT A THEORY
SMART can improve clarity, but a technically well-written goal may still be poorly chosen, externally imposed, disconnected from values or unsupported by an action plan.
TRINIDAD & TOBAGO APPLICATION
Outcome goals can provide direction, but athletes need performance standards and process behaviours that can guide daily preparation.
The swimmer wants a national medal but cannot control the competitors’ times.
A midfielder’s goal is national youth selection, which partly depends on selectors and team needs.
APPLIED TOOL
Why does this direction matter to the athlete?
What desired result provides direction without pretending to be fully controllable?
Which personal indicators show meaningful progress?
What can the athlete do consistently in training and competition?
What may interfere, and which people or resources can help?
Use evidence to maintain, revise or replace the goal and strategy.
WEEKLY REVIEW
CHECK YOUR UNDERSTANDING
Why is extrinsic motivation not one uniform category in self-determination theory?
Distinguish outcome, performance and process goals using one sport example.
How can a coach support autonomy while maintaining standards and structure?
Why is a SMART goal not necessarily an effective or ethical goal?
FOUNDATIONAL READING
READ · CONNECT · APPLY
Original teaching guide · Caribbean application · linked research
Connect a meaningful sporting ambition to actions that fit school, travel, practice opportunities and recovery.
Read the article →WATCH WITH A QUESTION
Ayelet Fishbach · TEDxChicago
A researcher's public talk about motivation. Use the ideas as questions to examine, not as a promise of selection or a sport-specific prescription.
Opens the provider’s video page in a new tab. Playback and captions are controlled by the provider.
Choose a goal and explain whose priorities it reflects.
Identify one suggested approach to motivation. Separate the approach from the outcome it is intended to support.
Adapt one idea to a fictional student athlete with a limited weekly practice opportunity.
A strong adaptation explains feasibility, the athlete's reason for the goal and a review method. It does not assume that motivation can remove travel or resource barriers.
Curated external video; the speakers and providers retain their content. No video loads automatically. Source pages checked 16 September 2026. Continue to the interactive activity ↓
PRACTISE THE CONCEPT
Connect an outcome goal to a performance target, a controllable action and a realistic review.
FICTIONAL CARIBBEAN TEACHING CASE
A fictional secondary-school footballer in Trinidad wants national youth selection. The player has written ‘get selected’ but has no weekly learning target. School assessments and the journey home affect attendance. The coach and player can agree on practice tasks within the existing programme.
Your learning goal: Distinguish outcome, performance and process goals, and adapt a plan to the athlete's resources and voice.
Goal-setting research examines how goals direct attention, effort and persistence under particular conditions. The athlete's commitment, feedback, task complexity and available resources affect how a goal can be used; writing a target is only a starting point.
This is a planning exercise, not a selection prediction or a recommendation to add training load. Agree any changes with the relevant coach and support team.
FROM UNDERSTANDING TO APPLICATION
Use a fictional or non-identifying example. Do not enter confidential or clinical information. Saving is optional and stays in this browser.
Open a printable blank worksheet ↗Teaching collection: Dr. Marlon Melville
Activity updated 16 September 2026 · Privacy & saved work